Two Wives in Europ

I have just read some news about an Iraqi who worked with the Danish forces in Iraq as a translator, and who could then immigrate to Denmark as a prise for the hard work. The problem is that this person has two wives........ Europe doesnt allow this, its Inhuman (in their eyes). Now the Iraqi has to think which one he should keep. I would suggest him to keep the new one in his papers, and the old one as a mistress :P .

This subject makes me feel sick, Now a man can not have more than one woman, if we forget all about the religion, then it is so simply because it does not suit this time. What is the difference between an animal with more than a partner and man if the man will have 2,3 or 4 wives?

What makes me angry most is the people who use Quran as a proof they can do this animal action. When Quran clearly showed that it is not preferable and only under the condition a man takes care of orphans, and afraid he will not be fair with them, then he can get another wife to feel that he has a whole family. So in Quran, this thing is allowed only for WEAK men, a man who is getting another wife is admitting in front of the whole community that he is afraid not to be fair with the orphans he is taking care of. Who would do that? sadly some Arabs do, and they know nothing in the Quran but the end of a verse that says two, three or four wives. they know nothing about the beginning of this verse.

The problem is when we read the comments of the people on this subject ......
I still hope he will chose the new one, if the old one had some dignity she would have left him long time ago.

Religious Perfection

This idea visits my thoughts when ever I read something about religious people looking at our symbols as if they were perfect.

Fact is, since Adam and Eve had sex without the permission of God (ate from the tree), they have planted the mistake in them and the whole human race. For that, earth (governed by human) changed from a heaven of close-to-perfection into a place that endures mistakes. So any symbol that comes to earth can not be perfect anymore, including the holy books.

Human should stop being blind when discussing religion, as if his prophet was perfect or his holy book is perfect, when he (the imperfect human) is the one who uses it and explain it, even if it was perfectly written.

In the end, we are the ones who define perfection too, so our definition for that may not be perfectly right.

I think our idea about what religion is, HOW to have it, should change, one reason it takes the form it has now is the idea of religious perfection that we have in mind.